wrote: 
> My intentions are going for a 1600x1200 resolution 
> and my  
> preferred brand would be a Samsung again !! 
> 
http://www.samsung.com/au/products/monitors/tft/index.asp 
Svobi, Martin --  
I bought my LCD monitor (which remains a backup and 
for local portability, as I continue to use a CRT day 
to day in my home office) back in mid-'04, so I can 
only give you general and not the most current info.  
That said, I think the main differences with today are 
apt to be: lower prices, better value for the dollar, 
faster response time (in milliseconds -- has 
implications mostly for video playback or gaming), and 
possibly a better picture *in some cases.*  My LCD is 
a 19" Planar, purchased from Dell.  Planar sells only 
direct, or through Amazon or Dell.  I was extremely 
picky about picture quality when I bought mine -- 
especially at the prices then in effect -- and at that 
time the only panels I saw (out of many) that I did 
not have some serious objections to were Samsungs, 
Dell's "own" label, and the Planars.  I had also read 
a whole bunch of reviews. 
At that time the Dells were all rebadged Samsungs, and 
may still be.  (There must be some place to find that 
out.)  My brother bought a couple of the Dell 2000-FP 
series, and liked them a lot.  With Dell online 
rebates and time-linked coupons, they were a major 
savings over the equivalent unbadged Samsungs.  Also 
had some extra connectors and other features.  The 
Planars were a good value also. 
> Beside of the resolution I also would consider the 
> Pivot function: 
> Changing from landscape to portrait may be supported 
> with SNAP  
> as a custom setting !? However with anything else 
> than OS/2 it may  
> be supported better !? 
Pivot software may be included with certain panels / 
models (it was with mine), but it is Windoze only.  
Perhaps it would work under SVISTA -- no idea. 
Martin wrote: 
>What is the story about analog and digital input?  
It all depends on your video card.  My older Matrox 
card is dual-head, the other head being a DVI type 
(digital), which is needed for many LCD panels.  My 
Planar panel happens to accept either analog or DVI, 
so I have connection options.  That's good, because I 
mostly use it with the Shuttle (double-shoebox size 
computer), which has its video on a MB chip, and I 
believe has NO digital output.  If any panels 
currently on the market still give you a choice, I'd 
say it's good to retain that flexibility.  You never 
know what you might want to connect your panel to, at 
some point. 
> Also, I am used to a 15 inch diagonal CRT monitor. I 
> suppose anything larger (17, 19 inch) will seem  
> like a great deal to me.  
Anything smaller than 17" (or equivalent CM, Svobi !) 
is a big mistake, IMO. 
> If I get a larger size monitor will I be able to  
> see text better at a resolution  
> higher than 1024 x 768? 
Here's the deal, and it's a problem we'll all have to 
deal with in the post-CRT era, also for TVs.  These 
are *fixed-pixel* displays.  They each have some 
native resolution, at which the picture looks best.  
Everything else is achieved by -- what is the right 
term ? -- scaling, interpolation ?  You can run at 
other resolutions, but if you can stick to that native 
resolution, you'll have by far the best results.  In 
computer monitors, I think the main choice *was* to 
get SXGA (1280 x 1024 native res. ?), or UXGA (1600 x 
1200 res. ?, mostly available in panels 20" or larger 
?).  Don't want to completely trust my  recall here, 
and I'm assuming this all still applies. 
I'm guessing you won't care all that much about 
response time.  When I bought my LCD, 25ms. r/t was a 
big deal, and the first 16ms. panels were just 
starting to come on the market.  Now there are 8 ms. 
or 6ms. panels and TVs.   
In an earlier post, you asked about plasma.  Forget 
about that: much more expensive, only available for 
larger size TVs (40" and up), TTBOMK. 
> What is wrong with getting a Fry's special Flat  
> panel monitor?  
Because their house brands, like GQ, really SUCK !! 
> Will it have a poor quality picture? Will it not be 
> bright enough? Will it wear out fast? 
Wouldn't surprise me at all . . . .  
Good luck. 
 Jordan 
P.S.:  I was just about to send you this reply this 
morning, when the power went out for  
6 1/2 hours.  So now I'm sending it from another 
location. 
===================================================== 
To unsubscribe from this list, send an email message 
to "steward@scoug.com". In the body of the message, 
put the command "unsubscribe scoug-help". 
For problems, contact the list owner at 
"postmaster@scoug.com". 
===================================================== 
<< Previous Message << 
 >> Next Message >>
Return to [ 19 | 
August | 
2007 ]
The Southern California OS/2 User Group
P.O. Box 26904
Santa Ana, CA  92799-6904, USA
Copyright 2001 the Southern California OS/2 User Group.  ALL RIGHTS 
RESERVED. 
SCOUG, Warp Expo West, and Warpfest are trademarks of the Southern California OS/2 User Group.
OS/2, Workplace Shell, and IBM are registered trademarks of International 
Business Machines Corporation.
All other trademarks remain the property of their respective owners.