SCOUG-HELP Mailing List Archives
Return to [ 05 | 
September | 
2003 ]
<< Previous Message << 
 >> Next Message >>
 
 
 
Content Type:   text/plain 
=====================================================  
If you are responding to someone asking for help who  
may not be a member of this list, be sure to use the  
REPLY TO ALL feature of your email program.  
=====================================================  
 
So what are you planning to get (make & model)?  
 
On Thu, 4 Sep 2003 15:10:53 PDT7, Gary Granat wrote:  
 
>=====================================================  
>If you are responding to someone asking for help who  
>may not be a member of this list, be sure to use the  
>REPLY TO ALL feature of your email program.  
>=====================================================  
>  
>On Thu, 4 Sep 2003 06:07:36 PDT7, Mark Abramowitz wrote:  
>  
>>>Not a chance.  Should I construe this to be your estimate that processor  
>>>speed is a nonissue?  
>>  
>>I'm no expert, but I can't understand why this should matter.  Perhaps the  
>>reference is because of the packaged software and drivers - I've seen lots  
>>of hardware that does this.  
>  
>and...  
>  
>On Thu, 4 Sep 2003 07:58:17 PDT7, Steven Levine wrote:  
>  
>>>Not a chance.  Should I construe this to be your estimate that processor  
>>>speed is a nonissue?  
>>  
>>Pretty much.  I read these kinds of statements more as a measure of the  
>>CPU power needed to run the bundled Windows apps.  
>  
>Thanks to you both.  That clears up a bunch of anxiety.  Off hand, I couldn't  
>see how the basic function of the CD-RW drive was processor speed dependent (up  
>to a point, I suppose -- the system has to be able to feed the data to the  
>drive at some reasonable speed) but no one bothers to advertise that.  Oh,  
>well...  
>  
>Steven further said:  
>  
>>One thing that no one has really mentioned is that there are just a few  
>>manufacturers of CD-RW drive mechanisms.  Most of what you buy will be a  
>>rebadged version of one of these base drives.  
>  
>Interesting point.  One thing I read yesterday (and I can't recall just where)  
>claimed that a particular Plextor model was a rebadged NEC drive.  The author  
>of the comment didn't think much of the firmware, for some reason.  This came  
>from a German source, and it seemed to me that there was a preoccupation with  
>firmware updates and firmware quality.    
>  
>Anyway, I'm getting ready to commit in the next day or two, probably.  I have  
>appreciated the thoughts and assistance from all concerned.  
>  
>--gary  
>=====================  
>ggranat@earthlink.net  
>  
>  
>=====================================================  
>  
>To unsubscribe from this list, send an email message  
>to "steward@scoug.com". In the body of the message,  
>put the command "unsubscribe scoug-help".  
>  
>For problems, contact the list owner at  
>"rollin@scoug.com".  
>  
>=====================================================  
>  
>  
>  
 
 
 
=====================================================  
 
To unsubscribe from this list, send an email message  
to "steward@scoug.com". In the body of the message,  
put the command "unsubscribe scoug-help".  
 
For problems, contact the list owner at  
"rollin@scoug.com".  
 
=====================================================  
 
  
<< Previous Message << 
 >> Next Message >>
Return to [ 05 | 
September | 
2003 ] 
  
  
The Southern California OS/2 User Group
 P.O. Box 26904
 Santa Ana, CA  92799-6904, USA
Copyright 2001 the Southern California OS/2 User Group.  ALL RIGHTS 
RESERVED. 
 
SCOUG, Warp Expo West, and Warpfest are trademarks of the Southern California OS/2 User Group.
OS/2, Workplace Shell, and IBM are registered trademarks of International 
Business Machines Corporation.
All other trademarks remain the property of their respective owners.
 
 |