SCOUG-HELP Mailing List Archives
Return to [ 09 | 
October | 
2003 ]
<< Previous Message << 
 >> Next Message >>
 
 
 
Content Type:   text/plain 
=====================================================  
If you are responding to someone asking for help who  
may not be a member of this list, be sure to use the  
REPLY TO ALL feature of your email program.  
=====================================================  
 
Ray Davison wrote:  
>   
> Peter Skye wrote:  
>   
> > I am sending this message at 3:50 a.m. from a machine set  
> > to PDT (-0700).  See what time your email program displays  
> > for it.  It *should* say 3:50 a.m. (give or take a minute  
> > -- I don't know if the SCOUG list server is sync'd to any  
> > NTP servers and there will be a few seconds of lag as this  
> > message is sent to everyone on the list).  
> >  
> > If the message time stamp displayed on your screen says  
> > 10:50 a.m. (+0000) instead of 3:50 a.m. (-0700) then your  
> > machine (or at least your email program) thinks you are in  
> > the GMT time zone.  
> >  
>   
> Clipped from your header: 10/08/03 10:48 am  
 
Hi Ray,  
 
The copy of my message that I received here contains the following:  
 
  Date: Wed, 8 Oct 2003 03:48:36 PDT7  
  X-OldDate:   Wed, 08 Oct 2003 03:50:31 -0700  
 
It looks like your Mozilla is displaying UTC (GMT) time rather than  
"local" time.  
 
> So maybe you understand the question.  The  
> answer - according to you and Steven - is  
> complain to Mozilla, Warpzilla, Mike Kaply??????  
 
Yes.  On the Mozilla OS/2 web page there should be a link for bug  
reports.  It used to be called bugzilla and it used to be at  
http://bugzilla.mozilla.org/ but I don't know if that's still accurate.  
 
> I have been mostly trying to determine  
> if there is anything I can do on my end.  
>   
> To present the situation somewhere else I think I would  
> have to determine if it is a Mozilla or Warpzilla problem.  
> And no, they are not necessarily the same product.  
 
I'm still wondering if Mozilla has a switch somewhere that selects  
either local time or UTC (some people like to have their system clocks  
set to UTC).  The following is from my message last Sunday and might  
give you enough information to make the bug report, and if there is such  
a switch then somebody will let you know:  
 
    If you want to verify the +0000 is coming from your  
    machine, send a test message with IPTRACE on and look  
    at the Date: line (it will be in ASCII after you  
    IPFORMAT the captured data).  
 
    Here's another test:  
 
    -- 1. From the command line, run SET | FIND /I "TZ" to  
    verify that TZ is set.  
 
    -- 2. From the _same_ command line (so you know TZ is  
    set) start your Mozilla email client.  
 
    -- 3. Send a test message to yourself.  When you receive  
    the message, look at the header and see what the Date:  
    line looks like.  
 
Stephen's tests on Tuesday may also be helpful.  I don't know if he ever  
posted a summary of what he found.  
 
I _think_ there are two simultaneous problems here; a bug-or-switch in  
Mozilla plus the SCOUG list server using "PDT7" instead of "-0700"  
(which isn't a bug but "PDT7" apparently isn't compatible with all email  
clients).  
 
- Peter  
 
 
=====================================================  
 
To unsubscribe from this list, send an email message  
to "steward@scoug.com". In the body of the message,  
put the command "unsubscribe scoug-help".  
 
For problems, contact the list owner at  
"rollin@scoug.com".  
 
=====================================================  
 
  
<< Previous Message << 
 >> Next Message >>
Return to [ 09 | 
October | 
2003 ] 
  
  
The Southern California OS/2 User Group
 P.O. Box 26904
 Santa Ana, CA  92799-6904, USA
Copyright 2001 the Southern California OS/2 User Group.  ALL RIGHTS 
RESERVED. 
 
SCOUG, Warp Expo West, and Warpfest are trademarks of the Southern California OS/2 User Group.
OS/2, Workplace Shell, and IBM are registered trademarks of International 
Business Machines Corporation.
All other trademarks remain the property of their respective owners.
 
 |