SCOUG-HELP Mailing List Archives
Return to [ 26 | 
March | 
2003 ]
<< Previous Message << 
 >> Next Message >>
 
 
 
Content Type:   text/plain 
=====================================================  
If you are responding to someone asking for help who  
may not be a member of this list, be sure to use the  
REPLY TO ALL feature of your email program.  
=====================================================  
 
> >Poor Peter!  
>   
> True enough.  He's taken on a thankless task.  
> If he wasn't laughing, he would be crying.  
 
Gee, I just got back from the Court Clerk's office and found I now have  
a support group.  Thanks, guys.  
 
> Most folks would be losing their  
> hair over something like this  
 
If you're losing your mind, why worry about the hair?  
 
> although his hair just seems to be getting longer.  
 
No time for a hair cut.  Well, The Duck came in with the propane welding  
torch and offered one, but . . .  
 
As for the inlaws:  We have a joint meeting with the Parole + Probation  
people tomorrow to see if we can get one of them out of the slammer.   
Another is about to go in; the judge took last weeks' motion and  
sentencing "under advisement" which means he needs his law clerk to  
research the whole thing some more ("This person did WHAT?  I've never  
seen ANYONE do that before!!!").  We're still trying to keep the DA from  
filing on a third one for three assaults from last year, they are  
"holding the case" even though the sheriff made good arrests.  The  
fourth one looks like it's a goodluck pass because although the cops  
found baggies in the car it was being driven by a friend when it was  
stopped and there are enough legal issues where they can't say whose  
baggies they were -- this one is smart enough, having already served  
time for grand theft auto, to know never to let one's fingerprints get  
on something that might be checked later.  Speaking of grand theft auto,  
the recent "indiscretion" was neatly solved by buying the car, the owner  
was thrilled with the price he got -- no victim, no case.  And the bank  
fraud case has been dropped because the bank misplaced their file.  As  
for the multiple bankruptcy filings, we're still in the middle of all of  
that.  The theft of the family trust funds has gotten messier because  
there is tax fraud liability on both sides.  Oh, and the separate issue  
of theft of legal trust funds is still in limbo.  We had some houses  
lost due to the financial situation and some of them still have to find  
permanent living accomodations.  We had one of them just give up last  
January, one of the others tried but was unsuccessful.  Trust funds seem  
to be especially popular targets -- a few years ago one of them ran off  
with 100G from the family trust fund and we ended up writing it off to  
the IRS as "theft" (which you can do).  
 
I'm thinking about opening an Attorney Referral Service so I can at  
least get 10% back.  
 
Ain't inlaws wonderful?  
 
- Peter  
 
 
 
=====================================================  
 
To unsubscribe from this list, send an email message  
to "steward@scoug.com". In the body of the message,  
put the command "unsubscribe scoug-help".  
 
For problems, contact the list owner at  
"rollin@scoug.com".  
 
=====================================================  
 
  
<< Previous Message << 
 >> Next Message >>
Return to [ 26 | 
March | 
2003 ] 
  
  
The Southern California OS/2 User Group
 P.O. Box 26904
 Santa Ana, CA  92799-6904, USA
Copyright 2001 the Southern California OS/2 User Group.  ALL RIGHTS 
RESERVED. 
 
SCOUG, Warp Expo West, and Warpfest are trademarks of the Southern California OS/2 User Group.
OS/2, Workplace Shell, and IBM are registered trademarks of International 
Business Machines Corporation.
All other trademarks remain the property of their respective owners.
 
 |